Verified cases

Turning the boring work you already knew into the product

Open the real page β†—betteranalyst.com Β· alive as of 2026-08-31

Spreadsheet formulas and data analysis, written from plain language. Because the founder came out of work he had done for years, the "what should I even sell" stage never happened. πŸ”΄ Checked 2026-08-31: `formulabot.com` now lands on `betteranalyst.com` β€” the site states "Formula Bot is now Better Analyst." ⚠️ Revenue figures come from the founder's own interview, so we do not print them (grade B).

In plain words

People get stuck writing spreadsheet formulas. This product writes the formula, and the analysis, from a sentence. The founder had spent years doing that work himself.

The whole thing at a glance

  1. To whom

    Office workers and small tea…

  2. What

    AI SaaS

  3. Found how

    Reddit β€” early spread throug…

  4. Paid how

    Subscription SaaS with separ…

Flow: To whom, then What, then Found how, then Paid how

Founder
David Bressler
Country
US
Team
β€”
Startup cost
β€”
To first revenue
β€”
Automation
high
Reported revenue
Revenue not disclosed

What is sold

Subscription SaaS with separate individual and team or business tiers

Checked on the official site 2026-08-31 β€” Starter $20/month, Max $40 per user/month, Business $80 per user/month, custom above that; annual billing is shown at half price. ⚠️ A discounted first month is displayed alongside; read that as the standard rate and you are off by a factor of two.

Who buys

Office workers and small teams living in spreadsheets; anyone cleaning data repeatedly

What arrives is not what you keep

  1. What the customer paidThe number on the invoice
  2. AI toolsA share of the monthly subscription
  3. Platform feeDiffers by platform
  4. TaxDiffers by country and business form
  5. What is leftAt or below zero, it is not a price
The rows are not scaled to amounts. Tools, fees, and tax differ per person, so we do not draw a share we did not measure β€” put your own numbers in the calculator.

This case does not publish its own tool costs, fees or tax. So we show the order and the items only β€” put your own numbers into the calculator.

AI's part and the person's part

Already had

A practitioner in the domain. This is not someone entering a new field because AI arrived; it is someone folding away the repetition in their own field. To copy it, start from work you have already done for years, not from learning AI.

If this is large, the AI is not the reason

What the AI did

Turning language into formulas, analysis and charts is the entire product. Upload a file or connect a source, ask a question, get tables and dashboards back. The AI does not assist with the work; it produces the deliverable.

the part a tool replaced

What the person did

Knowing which questions actually repeat in real jobs. The founder worked in this area for years, and that experience became the list of things worth automating. The decisive asset was not the ability to build β€” it was already owning the problem list.

stories that omit this do not replicate

The three columns are not proportional to contribution β€” we did not measure that. This is a schematic for separating them.

How customers were found

  1. Reddit β€” early spread through communities

  2. Search traffic from people looking up formula problems

  3. A free entry point anyone can use without paying first

  4. Paying customers

    Checked on the official site 2026-08-31…

Channels we could confirm from public sources. Conversion rates were not disclosed, so they are not shown.

Flow: Reddit β€” early spread through communities, then Search traffic from people looking up formula problems, then A free entry point anyone can use without paying first, then Paying customers

How we verified this

Evidence strengthBΒ· 2 source(s)

Public dashboard or platform figure. May be self-reported

Confirmed β€” the service is live and has been rebranded (2026-08-31: `formulabot.com` resolves to `betteranalyst.com`, and the site states "Formula Bot is now Better Analyst β€” same account and workflows"). Published pricing checked directly. Founder named. Interview post live (HTTP 200). Internally consistent β€” the interview's canonical URL references passing $500K ARR, which reconciles with the monthly figure we were given. Both, however, trace to the same founder statement, so this is internal consistency, not independent corroboration. Not confirmed β€” revenue. With no independent source, no amount is published. ⚠️ The rename is itself material. Metrics gathered under the old name belong to a different point in time than the product now carries.

See the grading rules

What made it work

The most reliable place to find something to sell is the tedious work you have already done for years. It beats scanning communities for complaints, because you already know each problem's frequency and urgency first-hand. And a free entry point outperforms advertising as an acquisition asset. A screen that solves one formula for nothing pulls people in from both search and communities.

Risks

  • General-purpose models keep getting better at this, and the spreadsheet vendors are shipping the same features; what remains defensible is how deeply the product is wired into a real workflow.
  • This is a product that changed its name β€” the position moved enough to require it, and search equity is fragile through that move.
  • Revenue rests on founder statements alone.

Does this work in Korea?

This is among the most transferable cases in the set. Spreadsheet work is the shared language of Korean office life, the language barrier is comparatively low, and the buyers already pay for software. The starting method transfers unchanged β€” the three table tasks you repeat every week at work are your product shortlist. ⚠️ Handling company data means disclosure of storage and cross-border transfer comes first.

Replicability in Korea4/5
Difficulty4/5

Solo-feasible: partially Β· Automation: high

7-day action plan

  1. Step 1. Write down three table tasks you repeat every week at work

  2. Step 2. Hand one to an AI and record exactly where it gets things wrong

  3. Step 3. Ask three colleagues what they would pay for something that catches those errors for them

30-day action plan

  1. Step 1. Build a free entry point that handles only the single most common request

  2. Step 2. Collect 30 real questions that arrive there and sort them into groups

  3. Step 3. Attach paid features to the largest group only

Run the numbers

We do not print a single projected figure here. Put your own numbers in instead.

Break-even calculator β†’

Get the next verification result

We check the AI income stories people are talking about, grade the evidence, and send you what we found β€” including what we could not confirm.

Words you may not know

Verification grade
How far we checked this case. A means the revenue was confirmed by someone other than the founder; B means the business exists but the revenue is only the founder's word.
Revenue
Everything that came in. Tools, fees and tax still have to come out before it is what you keep. The two are not the same.
MRR
Money that arrives every month, as opposed to a one-time payment.
Self-reported
A number the person stated about themselves. Nobody else confirmed it, which is why we do not print those numbers.
Replicability
How likely someone else is to get a similar result. The more the founder already knew the field, the harder it is to copy.