Verified cases

Selling AI chatbot builds on a Korean freelance marketplace, alongside a full-time job

Open the real page ↗kmong.com · alive as of 2026-08-16

A one-person listing that sells internal-document chatbots as fixed packages on Kmong, Korea's largest freelance marketplace. No revenue figure is published anywhere, so we do not print one. What we do print is the platform-displayed transaction count and the published price list — the price band is the useful part here.

In plain words

He builds a chatbot that searches a company's own documents. An employee asks “what was last year's leave policy?” and the bot digs through the files and answers. The price is fixed up front — ₩150,000 to ₩700,000 — and it takes three to seven days. He sells this alongside a full-time job.

The whole thing at a glance

  1. To whom

    Companies automating interna…

  2. What

    Automation agency

  3. Found how

    Kmong — marketplace search p…

  4. Paid how

    Three fixed packages

Flow: To whom, then What, then Found how, then Paid how

The money path, in real screenshots

Screenshots we took ourselves. Each carries the date and the address it came from — don't take our word for it, open the page.

  1. Step 1. What it costs

    ↔ Swipe sideways on a narrow screen

    The price ladder. Three tiers: ₩150,000 / ₩350,000 / ₩700,000. The tiers do not just cost more — delivery days (3/5/7) and revisions (2/3/5) go up with them. The expensive tier is not better AI. It is more of your hours.

    Captured 2026-08-16 · it may have changed since

  2. Step 2. Did anyone buy

    ↔ Swipe sideways on a narrow screen

    Did anyone actually buy? These numbers come from Kmong, not the seller — 18 completed orders, 96% satisfaction. Better than a screenshot the seller posted themselves. Even so, no revenue figure exists anywhere. Multiplying 18 orders by a listed price would be an estimate, so we do not do it. Note the two boxes on the right: this is an individual account, so it cannot issue tax invoices.

    Captured 2026-08-16 · it may have changed since

These screenshots are quoted for analysis; the underlying pages belong to their owners. We left out faces and the sellers' education and career panels — what we are reading is the price and the order record, not the person.

Founder
Nunnopi Coding (Kmong seller name)
Country
KR
Team
1
Startup cost
—
To first revenue
—
Automation
mid
Reported revenue
Revenue not disclosed

What is sold

Three fixed packages, separated by scope, turnaround and revision count

STANDARD ₩150,000 (3 days, 2 revisions) / DELUXE ₩350,000 (5 days, 3) / PREMIUM ₩700,000 (7 days, 5). Checked 2026-08-15.

Who buys

Companies automating internal document search and customer replies

What arrives is not what you keep

  1. What the customer paidThe number on the invoice
  2. AI toolsA share of the monthly subscription
  3. Platform feeDiffers by platform
  4. TaxDiffers by country and business form
  5. What is leftAt or below zero, it is not a price
The rows are not scaled to amounts. Tools, fees, and tax differ per person, so we do not draw a share we did not measure — put your own numbers in the calculator.

This case does not publish its own tool costs, fees or tax. So we show the order and the items only — put your own numbers into the calculator.

AI's part and the person's part

Already had

MSc in computer science. Machine-learning engineer, then data scientist, then analytics consultant, and VP of Engineering since February 2025 according to the profile. This is a side listing run alongside a full-time role.

If this is large, the AI is not the reason

What the AI did

Builds chatbots that search and summarise a company's own documents and interpret internal policy. The platform lists the tools used as ChatGPT, Midjourney, DALL·E and Stable Diffusion. What is sold is not AI itself but the configuration against one company's documents.

the part a tool replaced

What the person did

Requirement interviews, workflow design, document indexing and embedding settings, delivery and a usage guide. The listing says structure matters more than document volume — setting up that structure is the human part.

stories that omit this do not replicate

The three columns are not proportional to contribution — we did not measure that. This is a schematic for separating them.

Tools: ChatGPT · Midjourney · DALL·E · Stable Diffusion

How customers were found

  1. Kmong — marketplace search placement

  2. Platform-displayed “replies within 3 hours” (a ranking signal)

  3. Paying customers

    STANDARD ₩150

Channels we could confirm from public sources. Conversion rates were not disclosed, so they are not shown.

Flow: Kmong — marketplace search placement, then Platform-displayed “replies within 3 hours” (a ranking signal), then Paying customers

How we verified this

Evidence strengthB· 1 source(s)

Public dashboard or platform figure. May be self-reported

Checked the Kmong listing directly on 2026-08-15. Platform-displayed values — 18 completed transactions, 96% satisfaction, individual (not corporate) account, team size 1. The price list is published on the page and copied as-is. ⚠️ Those 18 transactions are the seller's total across all listings; this chatbot listing itself is new and has zero reviews. No revenue figure is published anywhere, so we print none — multiplying transactions by price would be our estimate, not a fact.

See the grading rules

What made it work

What is sold is the setup, not the AI. Buyers are not stuck because they cannot use ChatGPT; they buy so they do not have to fit it to their own documents. That is also why the price list is split by scope, turnaround and revision count rather than by outcome — the product is a bounded amount of labour.

Risks

  • The expertise bar is high. A master's degree and a work history are doing the trust work here; the same prices are hard to charge without them.
  • We cannot confirm this listing sells at all — it has zero reviews, and the 18 transactions belong to other listings. How long a new listing takes to get its first order is not something this case answers.

Does this work in Korea?

This is a domestic case, so there is little friction. Kmong accepts individual accounts and handles payment and settlement. Platform fees and income reporting are the seller's own; whether they can issue a tax invoice matters to corporate buyers — this seller is marked as unable to.

Replicability in Korea3/5
Difficulty4/5

Solo-feasible: yes · Automation: mid

7-day action plan

  1. Step 1. Search a freelance marketplace for “AI chatbot build” and copy the price lists of the top ten

  2. Step 2. Tabulate what those ten have in common: document integration, revision count, turnaround

  3. Step 3. Pick the smallest scope you could deliver within three days

30-day action plan

  1. Step 1. List that scope once, priced near the low end of those ten

  2. Step 2. Log how long you take to answer each enquiry

    platforms rank on it

  3. Step 3. After the first order, measure the hours you actually spent and divide. If the hourly rate is poor, cut the scope

Run the numbers

We do not print a single projected figure here. Put your own numbers in instead.

Break-even calculator →

How this reads for you

Answer 13 questions and we work out what this case would take in your situation. Answers stay in this browser.

Find models that fit you

Get the next verification result

We check the AI income stories people are talking about, grade the evidence, and send you what we found — including what we could not confirm.

Income models this case supports

Related cases

Words you may not know

Verification grade
How far we checked this case. A means the revenue was confirmed by someone other than the founder; B means the business exists but the revenue is only the founder's word.
Revenue
Everything that came in. Tools, fees and tax still have to come out before it is what you keep. The two are not the same.
MRR
Money that arrives every month, as opposed to a one-time payment.
Self-reported
A number the person stated about themselves. Nobody else confirmed it, which is why we do not print those numbers.
Replicability
How likely someone else is to get a similar result. The more the founder already knew the field, the harder it is to copy.